i too felt that it was too much white space
LAYOUT ANEMIA
I believe
ddarlak correctly identified what may have been the main weakness in the original layout. Too much white space. But it was not that there was too much white space surrounding the block of copy. Rather, there was too much white space within the letters and between lines.
The line spacing in the lettering, from top to bottom, was virtually identical. This is sometimes called “vertical justification,” and it is usually not a good design technique. It adds a vaguely monotonous element that is visually weak. It's an anemic, too-much-whiteness look that lacks strength. Yet it is extremely common in sign work today. And I think the reason for that is that it is difficult for many to identify as being a weakness.
In addition to the vertical justification, the medium letter stroke and the wide letter spacing in the original layout added even more whiteness.
The simplest solution to this problem does not necessarily involve color or typestyle changes, but simply manipulating the negative space. Tightening the line spacing is part of the fix. Then tighten the letter spacing. These two changes alone improve the layout nicely, as is obvious from
rick's two re-designs. His added touch, using a bolder version of the same letterstyle, strengthens the layout further. Increasing the top and bottom margins a little would have helped even more.
Though this layout could look good in dozens of different color combinations, reversing the colors, so that the letters are white and the background is dark, is an added way to increase the boldness of the lettering. This principle, that a white letter looks bolder than a dark letter, was identified and demonstrated by Hermann von Helmholtz, a German scientist, in the 1860s. I won't go into detail about it as my comments are already lengthy. I wrote a blog on the subject a couple years ago if anyone wants to read more.
GENEROUS MARGINS
Johnny Best's re-design (I'm looking at his first two) is a nice improvement, too. His is noteworthy for the generous margins around the copy. Graphic designer and author John McWade, in his book
Graphics for Business, said, “Wide margins are like fresh linen: they set an open, inviting table.”
A common mistake among novice designers is to view negative space as “wasted space.” Also, micromanaging clients invariably pressure sign designers to “fill up” the sign. They fear negative space, thinking that it prevents them from getting their money's worth. This is misguided thinking.
For good insight on the importance of viewing negative space as an essential design component, rather than merely background, see Alex White's book,
The Elements of Graphic Design, chapters 1 through 3.
I once heard a sign designer say, “put more space surrounding the layout, less space within the layout.” It's a good rule of thumb, generally.
SHOULD CLIPART BE IN A LOGO DESIGN?
A logo is a mark that represents a company or product. It can be composed of lettering or a graphic symbol or a combination of both. When I design a logo for a client, I want to make sure that it's something they can own completely. However, if the design incorporates a piece of clipart that is owned by someone else (the clipart service), then my client can't have complete ownership of their own logo. If the client then decides to spend the 600 dollars to register the logo with the US Patent & Trademark Office only to find out that they are denied registration because the design incorporates artwork owned by a third party, I have done them a disservice. Especially since the 600 is nonrefundable.
It's one thing to put clipart on our own shop sign and call it our “logo.” In that case, perhaps the worst that could happen is that another sign shop will open up a block away and buy the same clipart for their shop sign. But to use clipart as part of a logo design for a client, and imply that they then own the design, is misleading.
When we as designers buy clipart, we are in most cases not buying ownership of the artwork. We are merely buying a license to use it. And even then, the license often comes with restrictions. istockphoto, for example, specifically prohibits using any of its clipart as part of a logo or branding scheme.
I'm not against using clipart on sign work. Since I don't have the time or the talent to create original artwork on every sign I design, I use lots of clipart. Further, sign makers are not artists in the sense that a fine artist is, whose concern may center around self-expression. We are not trying to create works of art in that sense. In making signs, our goal is to make money by helping our clients make money. We are selling a form of advertising, and a very cost-effective one. Clipart helps to do that. But I often explain to a client that a design with clipart is not really a logo design. They will not own the clipart images nor can they prevent anyone else, including their competitors, from using the exact same clipart images.
Brad in Kansas City