Search results

dang! I thought you had an actual factual argument somewhere....

Dang! I guess Ika was right - you cannot refute, just resort to name calling...

I watched an interview that looked like it was from AF1 where Trump directly was asked and then answered about following SCOTUS.... I was not there and cannot confirm. I do think it is scary that the DOJ already said that the individual was only deported due to a 'clerical error' and that...

Please go and read the entire ruling -- the 9-0 was that the deported individual was to be returned to face due process. The ONLY aspect of the lower courts ruling that was asked to be changed was the word "effectuate" .. within hours of the SCOTUS ruling, the lower court issued a new order...

Well, I can agree to disagree.... I will give Trump credit for receiving an historic ruling - he actually got a Supreme Court vote of 9-0... that is an amazing feat!

I truly hope your faith is well spent. I say do not listen to what they are saying, but rather watch what they actually do (and then compare to what they have said....)

Yeah, I'm only human... but in fairness, it was the exact same sh*t flung back....

I am not offended. I just find it very interesting that when you bring up a point - like ventilators, then the data doesn't really fit your argument, you then just change the subject.... I asked you to dig just a little deeper into the actual technical specifications of what it takes to...

so now YOU are trying to throw zingers? and no - never stopped learning... when did you give up?

please just dive a little deeper into the complexities and problems they had - as well as what percentage of the 'global ventilator population' was actually from companies shifting production -- and remember this was also an incredibly expensive changeover that used similar technology to what...

and a quick reminder -- YOU brought up the ventilators -- I just figured I would use an example you are familiar with. I apologize if my ASS-U-ME-ption that you were actually familiar with the ventilator production was incorrect.

Right back at you! Again, I TRULY hope the things Trump says are true and accurate -- but then I watch his actions and I really just cannot tell for sure....

I TRULY HOPE YOU ARE CORRECT IN YOUR OPINION! Did you miss the part where Ford and Tesla ventilators had all but a zero impact due to it taking too long to ramp up production? (and ventilators are relatively simple items compared to semi-conductors.)

YES, YOU ARE CORRECT. However those some posts also covered that the volume they can produce is woefully low - remember, similar to your shop trying to supply signs for the entire country?

Yes, Tesla (hah!) and Ford made some ventilators -- please go and look and how long the tooling up took as well as how many they actually made. I am not going to argue - a mothballed factory is just as hard to restart as a wide format printer that has been left idle and dried up. Chip...

"Let's just restart our factories" after years of sitting dormant sound very similar to "Just plug it back in and print" referring to an Iris Graphics 3047 that was unplugged and left alone for 30 years....... something about old technology and dried up ink comes to mind...

didn't we ALL learn in Kindergarten that calling people names was unproductive? I think both of your sides are guilty of this.... try using plain facts without any name-calling and see how productive of a conversation you can have... both sides simply saying the other is name-calling seems...

but what is being said in the news seems to say 28% of pop, not reg voters.... but I did not conduct the polls and you did not post.

(I think your data actually speaks against your point.) Only about 30% of the registered voters actually voted for the current administration (yes, 49.5% of cast votes -and the winning side but it was won without a majority) - and only about half of our population is registered to vote...

...or fourth.... or fifth....