WildWestDesigns
Active Member
Interesting:
Article
If this is true, that does expose a certain chink in "AI" bubble. If these products were as good as everyone was hocking, they shouldn't have to using the stick to get their own devs to working on it and "have" to use it. Now, the article did mention one good reason for doing so, the more one uses it, the better can refine it for other users. I have been working on an in house stop motion/traditional 2D animation program and of course, using it has made it better, how to implement and what to implement. But these are the devs that are supposedly being told that they have to use it and this is a company that has a lot of money tied into this tech stack.
Most on here that can stay awake through my tirades know that I'm no fan of this, not for programming and not for art. It has been shown to have affects on just regular users, but apparently it is affecting the devs that are connected to the tech themselves and they apparently have to twirl around that "stick".
Article
If this is true, that does expose a certain chink in "AI" bubble. If these products were as good as everyone was hocking, they shouldn't have to using the stick to get their own devs to working on it and "have" to use it. Now, the article did mention one good reason for doing so, the more one uses it, the better can refine it for other users. I have been working on an in house stop motion/traditional 2D animation program and of course, using it has made it better, how to implement and what to implement. But these are the devs that are supposedly being told that they have to use it and this is a company that has a lot of money tied into this tech stack.
Most on here that can stay awake through my tirades know that I'm no fan of this, not for programming and not for art. It has been shown to have affects on just regular users, but apparently it is affecting the devs that are connected to the tech themselves and they apparently have to twirl around that "stick".