• I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...

Sorry State of "Today".

Status
Not open for further replies.

Texas_Signmaker

Very Active Signmaker
Oopps it was a dud... but still effective.

-T2UqAMugaNFTFZ0npPHeN77n85I8bRQMn5AZxkUasqRMvWce-i9uCVCWBjYio4yb6eqv9Y5cIvoTpcIx9X0TS7EzZRjGIkKjgETZCNGWqiacgkvhENpyMIHb3OyKOOwfDX-HuhgGxk=w1115-h938-no
 

Johnny Best

Active Member
OK, I am registering to be a Democrat, watching CNN and CNBC, going to get rid of my fossil fuel cars. No more meat because that comes from animals that fart which can help global warming. Get on the twitter hate towards Trump and read articles about being happy, be open minded and give all my money to the least fortunate. Love Mexicans and put them up at my house while they wait to be accepted in the US. Give more thought at railroad crossings, and last but not least put agree or like buttons on Toad's posts because he feels slighted.
Toad won the essay question debate this morning but we will have to redact any plagiarism he might have used and that might use up all my Sharpie ink.
 

Gino

Premium Subscriber
You should think about becoming a sign designer. Your use and obvious skill of sign elements is astonishing. Incredible insight to the needs of many.
 

rossmosh

New Member
The New Deal was a socialist economic stimulus package. Without it, we wouldn't have been prepared to help during WWII and certainly would not have been in a position to prosper after WWII.

Tax brackets over history: https://taxfoundation.org/us-federa...2013-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets/

Reagan got rid of the FCC Fairness doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine

Union Membership's decline and the relationship to wages: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Union_membership_in_us_1930-2010.png

Wealth disparity Information: https://apps.urban.org/features/wealth-inequality-charts/

Healthcare Costs Over Time: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...stantially-over-the-past-several-decades_2017

Simply put, there's a reason why people are upset by the situation.
 

AF

New Member
The New Deal was a socialist economic stimulus package. Without it, we wouldn't have been prepared to help during WWII and certainly would not have been in a position to prosper after WWII.

Tax brackets over history: https://taxfoundation.org/us-federa...2013-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets/

Reagan got rid of the FCC Fairness doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine

Union Membership's decline and the relationship to wages: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Union_membership_in_us_1930-2010.png

Wealth disparity Information: https://apps.urban.org/features/wealth-inequality-charts/

Healthcare Costs Over Time: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...stantially-over-the-past-several-decades_2017

Simply put, there's a reason why people are upset by the situation.

How did the great recession occur? How did every recession occur? Who started WWI and WWII and almost WWII? If a group of people go around burning down everyone's homes and then the same people come up a "solution" to the problem, are they heroes? You have much to learn. History is your friend.
 

Texas_Signmaker

Very Active Signmaker
The New Deal was a socialist economic stimulus package. Without it, we wouldn't have been prepared to help during WWII and certainly would not have been in a position to prosper after WWII.

Tax brackets over history: https://taxfoundation.org/us-federa...2013-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets/

Reagan got rid of the FCC Fairness doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine

Union Membership's decline and the relationship to wages: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Union_membership_in_us_1930-2010.png

Wealth disparity Information: https://apps.urban.org/features/wealth-inequality-charts/

Healthcare Costs Over Time: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...stantially-over-the-past-several-decades_2017

Simply put, there's a reason why people are upset by the situation.


WTF??? Did we really have a 94% tax rate in 1945? That can't be right.
 

Texas_Signmaker

Very Active Signmaker
We did but only on a class of people making what would be in today's dollars millions a day. It also led to the generation of the un-tied corporate entity and the ability reclassify income.

Well, not "millions a day" It was for people over 200k which today would be 2.8 million. Good chunk of change... and even more so back then. Interesting though
 

Christian @ 2CT Media

Active Member
Well, not "millions a day" It was for people over 200k which today would be 2.8 million. Good chunk of change... and even more so back then. Interesting though
But the target was for the corporate entities like Chase, Boeing, etc who were capitalizing on the war efforts. It was also a turning point in which "CEOs" could disassociate themselves from all the profits by reclassifying incomes similar to today's tax system.
 

Texas_Signmaker

Very Active Signmaker
But the target was for the corporate entities like Chase, Boeing, etc who were capitalizing on the war efforts. It was also a turning point in which "CEOs" could disassociate themselves from all the profits by reclassifying incomes similar to today's tax system.

Seems a flat tax would solve a lot of the mess that goes on today.
 

Christian @ 2CT Media

Active Member
Seems a flat tax would solve a lot of the mess that goes on today.
I couldn't agree more... But alas people on both sides would complain that their 10% is worth more than someone elses 10%.

I think with the flat tax it should scale up through 200% of the poverty threshold and then cap with no deductions. For the Corporate tax rate it should be a scaled tax with no deductions, scaled based on net income tiers and those funds can't be taxed twice once passed through to personal income through capital gains.
 

Texas_Signmaker

Very Active Signmaker
I couldn't agree more... But alas people on both sides would complain that their 10% is worth more than someone elses 10%.

I think with the flat tax it should scale up through 200% of the poverty threshold and then cap with no deductions. For the Corporate tax rate it should be a scaled tax with no deductions, scaled based on net income tiers and those funds can't be taxed twice once passed through to personal income through capital gains.

Yea I agree with the 200% of poverty. I've been in favor of a fair tax since first hearing about it and that is one of the main reasons I'd align more towards the libertarian side. You'd think Democrats, the party that wants everyone to pay their "fair share" would pick up on this and run with it but I don't see any of them doing that. o_O
 

Christian @ 2CT Media

Active Member
Im no economist so I don't know with all of our spending and social programs if it could work. I'm also not for doing away with medicare or social security as those were both designed to be solvent and is a small portion of the deductions.

For the Corporate tax, the hardest part would be standardizing accounting for transparency. This would kill the Futures and Hedge stock market and create a socialized oversight which would probably make it DOA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top