JamesLam
New Member
I thought Kennedy was going to deal with this issue.
-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
US Tariffs, Sigh!
- Thread starter JamesLam
- Start date
JamesLam
New Member
It will be interesting to see if the tariffs are overturned if the decision(s) impact the De Minimis Exemption and the Informal Entries as well.
Yeah, I think the de minus affects Canada more than the tarrifs do since we have cusmca. I know it's destroyed temu / shein and all the Chinese sites.... I've heard most of the Canadian retailers on eBay / Etsy and all the online sites have pretty much had to shut shop.
We ship quite a bit to America... Before it was easy, now it requires pre clearing and providing cusmca certification saying the products were made in Canada with Canadian / USA goods... And even then, our customer for an $800 charge in a $4000 order... It took us a week to get it fixed, and we're told even with all the proper documentation ups is getting billed for goods it shouldn't, and they have no choice but to pass it onto the customer while it's being fought.... Shipping is a mess right now. Would be nice if deminis change and tarrifs went away!
We ship quite a bit to America... Before it was easy, now it requires pre clearing and providing cusmca certification saying the products were made in Canada with Canadian / USA goods... And even then, our customer for an $800 charge in a $4000 order... It took us a week to get it fixed, and we're told even with all the proper documentation ups is getting billed for goods it shouldn't, and they have no choice but to pass it onto the customer while it's being fought.... Shipping is a mess right now. Would be nice if deminis change and tarrifs went away!
Johnny Best
Active Member
Texas_Signmaker
Very Active Signmaker
Geneva Olson
Expert Storyteller
Hasn't he started already?
MikePro
Active Member
welp if they read the Constitution, & subsequent laws, then SCOTUS will rule that the appeals court overreached on Presidential authority.
i wouldn't expect a canadian to notice such things, but judges should know better
...well they knew, but did it anyways to be political douchebags.
buckle up buttercup. daddy's here to stay.
i wouldn't expect a canadian to notice such things, but judges should know better
...well they knew, but did it anyways to be political douchebags.
buckle up buttercup. daddy's here to stay.
Last edited:
Want to place $100 bet on that? Pretty sure scotus is far more familiar with the Constitution than Trump is. So I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is and say the tarrifs get ruled illegal by Scotus.welp if they read the Constitution, & subsequent laws, then SCOTUS will rule that the appeals court overreached on Presidential authority.
i wouldn't expect a canadian to notice such things, but judges should know better
...well they knew, but did it anyways to be political douchebags.
buckle up buttercup. daddy's here to stay.
Not hard, I'm just actually following the case.
Trump didn't impose the tarrifs under that act, and even if he did the max allowed time he's allowed to impose them is 150 days.... At a maximum of 15%, Which it's been well past that, and his constant you Oprah style shouting of countries getting tarrifs above 100% throws that argument under the bus anyways.
Look forward to spending your $100!
Trump didn't impose the tarrifs under that act, and even if he did the max allowed time he's allowed to impose them is 150 days.... At a maximum of 15%, Which it's been well past that, and his constant you Oprah style shouting of countries getting tarrifs above 100% throws that argument under the bus anyways.
Look forward to spending your $100!
I know it's a boring read. But rather than reading cherry picked highlights, I suggest reading the actual Acts - both sides are guilty of doing it, but people pick the sections they want others to see to try a d away people's opinions and ignore the important parts of the act.welp if they read the Constitution, & subsequent laws, then SCOTUS will rule that the appeals court overreached on Presidential authority.
i wouldn't expect a canadian to notice such things, but judges should know better
...well they knew, but did it anyways to be political douchebags.
buckle up buttercup. daddy's here to stay.
Whenever I see people arguing and listing specific sections... I always find the actual article, because even if they're not cherry picking... A lot of people are using their own interpretations of what the act actually says.
Like almost every act, there's specific steps to follow for the president to impose the act.... None of which were done.
You can be for the tarrifs, you can feel he should be able to impose them.... 10 years ago I would have said the president of a country should be in charge of these things... But these past few months have shown me Congress / the constitution was smart to have 3 seperate powers.
