Search results

I was told that the new LCD displays don't take hardly any more power than the electronic viewfinder. :help

Ya, cameras go through AAs like candy, and that'll cost you big bucks in the long run. Just get a second factory battery pack and you're good to go.

The logo looks too much like the VolksWagon logo. The font used in the lettering is not very nice looking; it's very harsh, and to me, 70s looking. Why the black stroke between the logo and the lettering? Yuk.

^^^ BTW, how was that blue NEUROLOGICAL CLINIC sign made? What material & finish?

Yup, that's the common scenario. The person who has the camera with them gets the shot(s), and the person with the big bad boy on the shelf at home gets squat.

Considering your outlay for the stand, the media, the ink, the cost of the printer, the maintenance cost of the printer, and your time (labour), you make "a great profit"?

With this one, the sub-text is too bold and tightly kerned.

Not bad, but I'd just like to see a less ubiquitous font for a logo. They're WAY better than your first image.

Unfortunately it doesn't really say "VISUAL IMPACT", meaning, it's kinda weak for the name. The logo part above doesn't have anything really creative about it - kinda harsh looking.

Also, one of the things I disliked about the Super-Zooms, is the inability to achieve a really shallow depth of field (again, due to the small sensor). The 20mm 1.7 lens I have for my G3 does a nice job of this, and also does well in low light situations. I can take picture indoors with low...

There's an entire section for M 4/3 cameras on the DP Review forum: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1041

http://www.four-thirds.org/en/microft/ You can find gobs of information on the 'net.

Yes, these "Super Zooms" aka "Bridge" point & shoot cameras are a pretty good choice for the non-serious photographer. Panasonic and others make some good ones too. I have the older Panny FZ-18. You can't change the lenses, but the zoom ability is pretty impressive. They all have a limiting...

Agreed. I find that more & more people now-a-days have the attention span of a gnat. This is arguably due to the internet, but that's another topic.

Your text towards the end is also incorrect. There are many images to be found on the 'net which are large enough to print. Google > Images > then select "Large" only.

Out of all those images you chose that!? It doesn't visually display at all the difference.

Further to my post #43, it seems IKEA is moving into more areas than just canvas prints: http://business.financialpost.com/2012/03/02/a-prefab-home-brought-to-you-by-ikea/ .

I'm surprised at just how often even some big companies can't provide the proper artwork, and just have a tiny GIF file.

http://bancomicsans.com/main/ http://sixrevisions.com/graphics-design/comic-sans-the-font-everyone-loves-to-hate/

Looks like Optima