The loss of a human skills base is definitely one of the things that worries me most about AI-based tools invading the software development field. Company executives can't see past the fog of their fantasies over goosed profit margins via fewer employees and much faster product development time lines. It turns out reality isn't so simple, hence some firms trying to hire back some of those human workers.
I would like to think the AI-based tools will only harm visual creative workers who are imposters -people who don't have actual creative talent, lack the skills to hand-draw/paint using traditional analog tools or at can't at least use the manual digital tools in apps like Illustrator to create clean, precise, professional looking artwork. Someone who is dependent on LiveTrace to do a vector conversion of a well known logo should be in more jeopardy than someone who can do a more precise job using the manual tools.
Unfortunately "professional quality" isn't the standard. With AI, "good enough to get by" is the new standard. If lots of creative workers are going to lose their jobs due to AI the job losses will be indiscriminate. There won't be any picking between real artisans and hacks. If anything, the folks with greater skill sets could be in more danger since they might have been pulling in bigger paychecks.
Earlier someone mentioned AI being similar to the arrival of vinyl cutters and how it destroyed a lot of hand-lettering work. I don't agree with that comparison.
Computer driven vinyl cutters were a big step forward for the
sign industry. Same goes for the routing tables. Both raised the quality bar. They did far more precise work at reproducing letter styles and logos onto real-world materials.
AI is not raising the quality bar. It's a move backwards. The technology may do things very fast, but it doesn't generate things accurately. I think "slop" is a very fitting word. It sure isn't art.