Search results

Just offering an alternative. Was the movie successful because of the font, or in spite of it?

If, like me, you cringe every time you see the Papyrus font used, I recently found a great substitute to offer your customers when they use or ask for Papyrus, and thought I'd share: http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/kenrusselldesign/wheat/

Not the forum.

I got nothing on on FMF, WFI, or WTF. Any ideas?

Ok Tiki, S-Rex, JHill, Fred.............you're up: Is this an old font, or a custom design? I've run it through FMF, WTF and WFI with no results. It may have originally been more condensed or extended - I'm not sure.

Ya, online search is still not working. Is Harris aware of this?

Thanks guys. It's so new that even a Google search doesn't have it. :U Rock:

Linky?

What is this? *If you're using FindMyFont, if you slam the tolerance slider all the way to the left, it should pick up the letters.

...but I got nothing with FMF, WFI or WTF.

Any idea what this is?

...if someone can ID this one. *That one letter is a "q" not a "g".

I've run this through the mill but got nothin'

Yes, that's been done two or three times. Not overnight though, 30-60 minutes I think.

...but I don't. It seems so familiar. Is it an old Gerber font?

Yes, I'm aware of the lossy factor. I always keep a master file which then gets cropped for various uses like Plasma TV display, smartphone, digital picture display, web, each with their own particular size and aspect ratio. Some of my older images are JPGs, but I now shoot Raw, so the image...

Hi OP. I'm not sure what you mean by "in my Corel", the actual size which shows in Photoshop of a 4592 x 3468 is 19.13" x 14.36" (at 240 PPI).

Am I correct in thinking that this is only true if one is able to save from a Raw or PSD file? I can't see being able to improve upon a JPG just by saving it as a TIF. (?)

Um, ok, but bear with me....If I uncheck the "Resample Image" box, as iprint suggested in his post, I'm actually reducing the PPI when I increase the physical size, not increasing, no?

Ah, ok, that seems to make sense. I tried that, and the PPI went to 114.8, which is acceptable (I suspect) for a 40" x 30" print.