In the 13 years I owned and managed
Signs 101, there was an evolved set of permissions and moderation that kept most memberships and posts in line with site rules and objectives. I would call my way of running things proactive and the new owner's way reactive. A different way of stating it was that I ran it as my primary livelihood while the new owner runs it as one of his several business enterprises. At least it still runs and the new owners have resolved a number of problems that the community was facing.
Of the many things mentioned in this thread, the most important one was when members would ask for open bids for doing work instead of respecting our merchant member's contribution and shopping them first. And every time such a post was made, some seeing it would take it as normal and OK. This was a clear conflict between member's rights to post freely and our desire to steer those who wanted to sell here into becoming merchant members and/or advertisers. It was not something I ever found a solid solution for. I cannot and do not speak for the new owners, but I am at a loss to understand why merchant membership here has been so devalued.
I did moderate all new members to insure that they had some connection to professional signmaking or a related profession. It was very time consuming. And I read every post made to insure that spam and other unwanted posting was removed in a timely fashion. And I always decided any issue based on member rights and also delivering value to merchants and advertisers.
Stating this does not imply right or wrong in either approach. All that really matters is the health of the forum community ... which seems fine if still continuing to evolve.
And I can't help but add in a gripe of my own towards the OP of this thread:
Despite his claims, Gino was a paid merchant member for only a few months - not for several years. And to the best of my knowledge is not an MM now even though he implies that he is in his signature. He is an incredibly helpful and knowledgeable member when he chooses to be and, at times, has demonstrated genuine concern for the well being of
Signs 101. He is also one who has a long history of offensive posts, confused thinking as to
Signs 101, and of stirring the pot for the fun of it.
So one may want to consider the source when reading any of his posts.