Don't get me wrong here... PLEASE.
The only thing that bothers me about the last one that Jill submitted is this:
There is a basic saying in the
sign industry... "You designed it... now build it".
This is NOT an old timer / youngin' thing nor a digital v paint point I am making. It is about DESIGN, and the ability to execute that design.
Now before anyone jumps on my case for saying this: let's just say that Jills design is going to be installed in Arizona - in 365 day sun. Inks from a digital printer are going to fade it quite quickly, even with lamination. Good for "repeat" business, but the owner has to either fork out more money, or be dissatisfied with a fading
sign he can't afford to keep replacing.
Are you seeing my point (of design flaw v capability) yet?
So maybe lets use paint ( for longevity) as an alternative in the manner the
sign is created in the first place. Now... I know Jill and I know she has the skills to do this. There are however many on the forum that just simply do not have either the desire or ability to work with paint. That blend Jill - as perfect as it is - VERY hard to do - even for an experienced person.
So I guess what I am putting forward is : think about the final output re design. Can it be painted, digitally printed, routed, plotted, embroidered, small, large, super large, gigantic etc.
Remember... the point to a good design is to have it as a tool to have your clients business grow and hence more business for you.
And before someone takes the route of " i'll just outsource it ", the idea in business is to make maximum $$$$ - not just a commission on others work.
Cheers
PS I actually like the design Jill.